FinTech Australia CEO Brad Kitschke said that Australia had fallen behind other established markets in passing the bill; and was surprised that consumer advocates would seek to delay something that would benefit consumers, increase transparency and result in more responsible lending practices as well as fairer access to credit.

“We are disappointed that there appears to be another delay in securing the passage of the comprehensive credit reporting legislation. It is ironic that that this legislation is being derailed and delayed by some consumer advocates, when consumers will be the overall beneficiary,” Mr Kitschke said.

“Had this law been in place, some of the horror stories being heard at the banking Royal Commission would have been avoided. Access to credit, and an obligation by lenders and providers of credit to consider all the relevant information about a person’s ability to meet the obligations of a loan or line of credit should be seen as a good outcome in light of some of the poor practices being uncovered.

“Under the government’s proposed framework, earmarked to begin from 1 July 2018, major banks will be required to have 50% of their credit data ready for reporting by September 2018, increasing to 100% a year later. ”

Mr Kitschke said that concerns by some consumer advocates that access to a comprehensive set of information about a consumer’s credit history would lead to inequality and unfairness were misplaced and he called on the consumer movement to offer alternative solutions instead of calling for a further delay.

“We are sympathetic to the views of consumer advocates who don’t want access to credit to be unfair or restricted based on historical information that may not be relevant or where it is not considered properly.  However, it seems nonsensical that some consumer advocates are asking for categories of information to be removed from the requirements that would weaken the rules.

“It’s entirely perverse that the delay is being championed by some consumer advocates, seeking changes that would weaken the laws, while standing in lock step agreement with the big banks and others who perpetrated the kinds of misdeeds that this legislation seeks to prevent.

“Rather than suffer yet another delay, or take another year to rehash the same issues, it would simply be appropriate for those consumer advocates to offer solutions that would enable the passage of the bill. It’s not good enough to simply throw stones and highlight problems at this late stage.”